Hi, there. The cherry blossom season is in full swing in Japan and we are very lucky to be able to witness it now. Today, I’d like to engage in a thoughtful discussion about perception and the diverse lenses through which we view the world. Before diving into this topic, let’s briefly touch on our weekly inventory check and the closure of March.
Weekly Inventory Check
As March comes to an end today, it’s a fitting moment to reflect on the past month and contemplate areas for improvement in April. Take some time to conduct an inventory of your experiences and actions, striving to understand the motivations behind your choices and how you can evolve personally and professionally.
Perspective and Lens
Now, onto the intriguing topic of how different perspectives shape our understanding of reality.
Recently, one of our friends became noticeably upset upon discovering that a game we frequently play is considered the national game of Israel. This game also has a digital version that we all enjoy together. His concern stemmed from the assumption that, being associated with Israel, the game might have been created by an Israeli developer. To address this, another friend conducted research and clarified that the game was actually developed in Estonia. However, this revelation did little to ease the initial friend’s apprehension, as Estonia is known to be a pro-Israeli country. He expressed reluctance to continue participating in the game, fearing that his involvement might inadvertently contribute to causes conflicting with his personal beliefs.
Despite arguments from others urging him to reconsider his stance, he remained firm in his decision, citing his unwillingness to take any risk associated with potentially supporting Israel. This situation highlighted the varying perspectives each individual brings to the table, with some advocating for giving the benefit of doubt to the developers, while others emphasized the importance of abstaining from any involvement that might indirectly support causes they oppose.
Ultimately, the dilemma underscored how personal beliefs and biases shape individuals’ perceptions and decisions. While some chose to continue playing the game, citing insufficient evidence to warrant concern, others remained steadfast in their refusal, recognizing the potential implications of their actions on broader geopolitical issues. This conversation served as a poignant reminder of the complex interplay between personal values, ethical considerations, and the subjective nature of evidence in decision-making processes.
Want More?
UCF Pressbooks discuss about the basic idea of perception in one of their articles.
Read this article to learn about the mathematics behind decision making.
This article has put forward different types of bias in decision making and how one can recognizr bias.
Reel of the Week
Check out our reel of the week. Frequent arguments lead to the unfortunate loss of meaning and a lack of resolution. These arguments often arise without any real necessity or requirement, and even when progress is made, it tends to be minimal. Consequently, it becomes evident that it would be beneficial to recognize the need to avoid such arguments altogether.
Instagram post by @thisisvasl
The Weekly Vasl Podcast
Our episode on Mind of a Champion is out now! You can watch it below! This Friday, I engaged in a riveting conversation with Adolfo from Spain, delving into the intriguing intersection of sports psychology and everyday mindset. In this enlightening podcast episode, we explored how principles from the world of sports can be applied to our daily lives, empowering us to achieve success and fulfillment. Discover the nuances of different mindsets that individuals commonly possess, and learn how certain circumstances can make it challenging to change our mindset while others present opportunities for growth and adaptation, encapsulating the essence of a growth mindset. This episode serves as a beacon of hope for those navigating personal goals and feeling stuck in their journey. Gain valuable insights into the art of training both the mind and body, knowing when to push beyond comfort zones and when to prioritize rest and rejuvenation.
We are also on Spotify, Apple, Google, and wherever you listen!
Thoughts to Leave You With
Before we wrap up, I feel compelled to shed light on an intriguing principle known as the “rule of 37%.” This concept advocates for a comprehensive exploration of various options and perspectives before arriving at a decision. By digging into a significant portion—approximately 37%—of available choices, one can gather valuable insights and make more informed judgments.
However, it’s crucial to approach this process with a balanced mindset. While thorough exploration is beneficial, immersing oneself in an excessive number of possibilities can lead to decision paralysis. It’s essential to strike a harmonious balance between thorough investigation and practicality, ensuring that the decision-making process remains manageable and effective.
Ultimately, embracing the rule of 37% encourages a thoughtful and methodical approach to decision-making, allowing individuals to consider a diverse range of options while avoiding the pitfalls of information overload.
Hi, there. The cherry blossom season is in full swing in Japan and we are very lucky to be able to witness it now. Today, I’d like to engage in a thoughtful discussion about perception and the diverse lenses through which we view the world. Before diving into this topic, let’s briefly touch on our weekly inventory check and the closure of March.Weekly Inventory CheckAs March comes to an end today, it’s a fitting moment to reflect on the past month and contemplate areas for improvement in April. Take some time to conduct an inventory of your experiences and actions, striving to understand the motivations behind your choices and how you can evolve personally and professionally.Perspective and LensNow, onto the intriguing topic of how different perspectives shape our understanding of reality. Recently, one of our friends became noticeably upset upon discovering that a game we frequently play is considered the national game of Israel. This game also has a digital version that we all enjoy together. His concern stemmed from the assumption that, being associated with Israel, the game might have been created by an Israeli developer. To address this, another friend conducted research and clarified that the game was actually developed in Estonia. However, this revelation did little to ease the initial friend’s apprehension, as Estonia is known to be a pro-Israeli country. He expressed reluctance to continue participating in the game, fearing that his involvement might inadvertently contribute to causes conflicting with his personal beliefs.Despite arguments from others urging him to reconsider his stance, he remained firm in his decision, citing his unwillingness to take any risk associated with potentially supporting Israel. This situation highlighted the varying perspectives each individual brings to the table, with some advocating for giving the benefit of doubt to the developers, while others emphasized the importance of abstaining from any involvement that might indirectly support causes they oppose. Ultimately, the dilemma underscored how personal beliefs and biases shape individuals’ perceptions and decisions. While some chose to continue playing the game, citing insufficient evidence to warrant concern, others remained steadfast in their refusal, recognizing the potential implications of their actions on broader geopolitical issues. This conversation served as a poignant reminder of the complex interplay between personal values, ethical considerations, and the subjective nature of evidence in decision-making processes.Want More?UCF Pressbooks discuss about the basic idea of perception in one of their articles.Read this article to learn about the mathematics behind decision making.This article has put forward different types of bias in decision making and how one can recognizr bias.Reel of the WeekCheck out our reel of the week. Frequent arguments lead to the unfortunate loss of meaning and a lack of resolution. These arguments often arise without any real necessity or requirement, and even when progress is made, it tends to be minimal. Consequently, it becomes evident that it would be beneficial to recognize the need to avoid such arguments altogether. Instagram post by @thisisvasl The Weekly Vasl PodcastOur episode on Mind of a Champion is out now! You can watch it below! This Friday, I engaged in a riveting conversation with Adolfo from Spain, delving into the intriguing intersection of sports psychology and everyday mindset. In this enlightening podcast episode, we explored how principles from the world of sports can be applied to our daily lives, empowering us to achieve success and fulfillment. Discover the nuances of different mindsets that individuals commonly possess, and learn how certain circumstances can make it challenging to change our mindset while others present opportunities for growth and adaptation, encapsulating the essence of a growth mindset. This episode serves as a beacon of hope for those navigating personal goals and feeling stuck in their journey. Gain valuable insights into the art of training both the mind and body, knowing when to push beyond comfort zones and when to prioritize rest and rejuvenation.We are also on Spotify, Apple, Google, and wherever you listen!Thoughts to Leave You WithBefore we wrap up, I feel compelled to shed light on an intriguing principle known as the “rule of 37%.” This concept advocates for a comprehensive exploration of various options and perspectives before arriving at a decision. By digging into a significant portion—approximately 37%—of available choices, one can gather valuable insights and make more informed judgments.However, it’s crucial to approach this process with a balanced mindset. While thorough exploration is beneficial, immersing oneself in an excessive number of possibilities can lead to decision paralysis. It’s essential to strike a harmonious balance between thorough investigation and practicality, ensuring that the decision-making process remains manageable and effective.Ultimately, embracing the rule of 37% encourages a thoughtful and methodical approach to decision-making, allowing individuals to consider a diverse range of options while avoiding the pitfalls of information overload.Powered by beehiiv The Weekly Vasl